Answer Intelligence (AQ)
  • Introducing AQ
  • Products
    • (FREE) Explore AQ
    • AQ Development Workbook
    • AQ Maturity Assessment
    • DISC AQ
    • AQ Record & Rate
    • Raise Your AQ App
  • Training
  • Partner
    • Overview
    • Certification
    • Certified Partners
  • Dr Glibkowski
  • Blog
  • Contact

HIGH AQ

The elevated answers blog.
Picture

The Six Answers of Caring

6/25/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
The foundation of High AQ is the ability to provide six answers (High AQ Practice 1).  My AQ is a series of articles that feature business executives that provide six answers to important topics and questions.

Jim Naro is a Predictive Index Partner and Business Partner of Customer Centric Selling. Jim cares about his clients. So often caring is an empty-phrase.  Not for Jim. He has six answers to demonstrate he cares for his clients.

Each answer by itself relates to a specific question. If you take all the answers together, it is the cumulative and reinforcing aspect of the answers that communicate authenticity.

WHAT is caring?
WHY is caring important?
HOW do I care?
WHAT is caring?
Concept
Metaphor
Concept
Picture
WHAT is caring?

​For Jim, caring is a concept that consists of four dimensions:  
  1. Long-term orientation: If you care about someone you want to be there for long-haul.
  2. Investment orientation: Your first instinct is to help others and you provide a lot of support. 
  3. Trust: You can be relied upon by others.
  4. Broad relationships: You care about someone personally and professionally.


Metaphor
Picture
WHAT is caring?

In sales, the metaphor of "land and expand" is used (particularly internally).  Or the metaphor of "hunters" or "farmers" is used.  When you hunt, the herd is diminished and an unaware being is shot dead. This is the opposite of caring. 

Jim's metaphor is consistent with farming: "plant and grow." But, he is passionate about trees, and that is where he locates his metaphor. He has different species in his yard. He likes to see them grow.  The metaphor is authentic.​
WHY is caring important?
Theory
Story
Theory
Picture
WHY is caring important?

​Jim's theory is....

Caring → Job Performance

Caring is important because it increases job performance. Theory is often subtle.  Jim realizes he cares about increasing performance. Connecting caring to a work outcome separates caring from personal life.  Often it is easy for a caring-relationship at work to digress to friendship or enjoyment, and the focus on performance is lost.

Jim is goal oriented, but he does this through developing relationships with customers, not focusing on transactional projects.



Story
Picture
WHY is caring important?

​Jim can tell several stories of caring that demonstrate the importance of caring to those he works with.  

It started on Campus (story): Jim is a college professor at Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU), where he teaches Sales Leadership. He was working with students to equip them for sales roles in the workplace. In order to help these students he became certified in Predictive Index (PI) so he could use this resource with his students.  He had no intention of selling PI as a consultant.  By servicing his students, it eventually led to learning about PI and ultimately wanting to share PI with his business clients. 

The moral of the story is that caring is at the center of what he does and the solutions he uses in business have others' interests at heart.
HOW do I care?
Procedure
Action
Procedure
Picture
 HOW do I care?

Jim has both broad and specific procedures to care for his clients. The broad journey he goes on with his clients consists of three steps:

 
Step 1: Questionnaire.  He asks questions about the person and the organization.  When you care about someone, you focus broadly.


​Step 2: Boots on the ground.  Many consultants provide guidance only.  Jim cares so he participates on sales calls with clients, and conducts talent strategy sessions.

Step 3: What else can we work on? Often a cliché, consultants want to land and expand.  But, in a caring relationship, getting involved in more aspects of the relationship is a natural outcome.
Action
Picture
HOW do I care?

Actions are used to implement each step of a procedure. 

Jim only provides solutions the client needs.  There are so many layers to complex sales.  Jim starts small and he realizes that a relationship will grow over time (see Procedure step 3).

It is tempting to say every consultant provides what the client needs.  But the reality is that many consultants care more about themselves than the client.
0 Comments

Interview AQ in the Movie "The Circle"

4/26/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
In this scene several aspects of AQ are demonstrated.  First, the interviewee must navigate question-recognition to determine if the question asked is a what- or how-question.  Next, the interviewee must provide the right answer.  When she finally does, she gets the job (spoiler alert). ​
0 Comments

Transform Leaders into In-House Trainers using Answer Intelligence (AQ)™

3/4/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture

Why use In-house leaders as trainers?

With no stop in sight, a trend is to use In-house leaders as trainers.  For example, Merck & Boeing regularly use leaders as trainers (see endnote 1). Merck partners leaders as trainers with academic faculty to co-teach classes, and Boeing vice presidents teach 2+ leadership classes a year.  Teaching the classes is part of the performance evaluation for vice presidents. There are several benefits of using leaders as trainers: ​​
  • Leaders are subject matter experts, and are in the best position to convey important knowledge used on the job.
  • The perceived meaningfulness of the content increases with leaders as trainers by virtue of their standing in the company.
  • Post training transfer increases because leaders as trainers are more committed to the training (because they delivered the content!).  Subsequently, during the important post-transfer period, leaders are more likely to provide opportunities to use learned skills and incorporate the training into ongoing coaching.
  • The elusive goal is to become a learning organization. Using leaders as trainers, the culture of learning is deepened as learning becomes everyone responsibility (not just the L&D staff).
  • Leaders as trainers also can be dovetailed with leadership development to achieve two objectives at once.

Preparing leaders to become trainers is challenging 

According to to the Association for Talent Development (atd) (see endnote 2), it takes 38 hours on average to develop 1 hour of face-to-face training.  The time burden increases in the online environment to 42 hours for passive instruction, and over 110 hours for active instruction that use scenarios for role playing.

Teaching a course is difficult, made more difficult if a leader does not have experience as a trainer. Leaders (as do-ers) have done it, but they may not be self-aware of how they succeeded in ways that others can follow. Or leaders may mistake training as a forum to just tell stories. These and other challenges confront the leader, who is all too often an inexperienced trainer.  To address this inexperience, train the trainer programs are designed to educate leaders on how to be an effective trainer.  The list of topics covered in the typical train the trainer program is long:
  • Facilitation Skills (facilitate a group conversation)
  • Training Design (objectives, learning styles, schedule, agendas)
  • Group Facilitation (involvement and engagement, group dynamics)
  • Presentation Skills (create visual structure and engagement)
  • Learning Theory (adult learning, knowledge, skills, abilities)
  • Experiential Learning (active learning that puts learners in high fidelity experiences)
  • and more…
In summary, transforming leaders into trainers is not easy.  A train the trainer program can last days and dozens of hours at a minimum of a leader’s valuable time.  Not surprisingly, a common push back is that it takes too long. ​

Use AQ to transform a leader into a trainer

If you are like many organizations that have implemented train the trainer programs to develop leaders into trainers, you know time constraints prevent the course you really want to run the leaders through.  Given a premium on leaders’ time, it is important that your train the trainer programs are efficient and effective.

To speed up and make the transformation from leader to trainer, try Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ as a learning framework.  AQ is a new science of answers (story, metaphor, theory, concept, procedure, action) that fully incorporates questions (what, why, how, where, where, who) to reimagine communication.  Put simply, business leaders use questions and answers everyday. The AQ framework codifies an approach toward communicating (and learning) that is fully accepted by leaders.  The framework is simple, (everyone has a basic understanding of questions and answers) requiring minimal time to learn.
Picture
AQ is consistent with well accepted aspects of learning.  For example:

AQ + knowledge. Training is about providing knowledge.  AQ is built upon knowledge.   Specifically, how-questions are associated with procedural knowledge that are addressed with procedure and action answers. What-questions are associated with declarative knowledge that are associated with concept and metaphor.  Why-questions are associated with structural knowledge (cause-and-effect) associated with theory and story.  Appealing to the left-side of the brain, procedure, concept, and theory are associated with objective knowledge (codifiable, exist outside the person).  Finally, appealing to the right-side of the brain, action, metaphor, and story are associated with objective knowledge (often referred to as tactic knowledge that cannot be separated from the experiences).

In sum, AQ is a theory of knowledge that you can use in your next train the trainer session.  For example, you can challenge a leader to distill their theory of “leadership” into a simple cause-and effect diagram. Or encourage leaders as trainers to identify a metaphor to share their experiences into a compact package that others can easily absorb.


AQ + skills. Training is about skills.  Central to skill development is application and role playing.  AQ works very well with role playing exercises.  In fact, question and answer exchange is the heart of most role playing.  Consider a sales role playing, where a sales leader (as the trainer) can ask “Why should I hire you?” or “How does the service work?”  These questions can be answered with AQ.  The application of AQ is a learned skill that relates to 5 High AQ Practices.  For example, Answer Twice is High AQ practice 2 that holds that an important why, what, or how question should be answered twice to make an emotional connection (right-sided answer: story, metaphor, action) and a logical connection (left-sided answer: theory, concept, procedure).  For example, the “How does the service work?” can be answered twice with a procedure and action(s).  The procedure is the steps in a process. Actions are associated with any given step, in terms of best practice or unique actions.  Using the 5 High AQ practices is a skill.  In other words, to Answer Twice requires effective and concise delivery.  

AQ + Learning Styles.  Answer With Style, High AQ Practice 4, holds that every teacher and student has distinct communication styles that impact learning.  Specifically, there are three styles: Relational (preference for story + metaphor), Analytical (preference for theory + concept), and Practical (preference for procedure + action).  If a trainer knows the style of the students, questions and answers can be anticipated and responded to.  Additionally, the teacher should know their own style to amplify strengths and guard against shortcomings. For example, if a teacher has a relational style, a potential gap is avoiding practical or analytical answers needed for learning.
(1) E. Betof, L. Owens, and S. Todd, "The Keys to Success in a VUCA World," T+D (July 2014), pp. 38-43.
(2) R. Defelice, "How Long to Develop one Hour of Training? Updated for 2017" (January 9, 2018) from www.td.org/insights.
If you found Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ an interesting framework, please share this post with others.  Also, try our FREE AQ test to gauge your AQ.
1 Comment

Personality (DISC®) and Communication: Distinct but Overlapping Circles

2/23/2021

0 Comments

 
categories: Disc AQ
Picture
Tracy L. Baumann is Director of Marketing at The Brooks Group, an award-winning Top 20 Sales Training Company.

This article is part of the High AQ Interview Series where executives, academics, and thought leaders discuss elevated answers.  The following interview is edited for clarity.

DiSC® and Communication

DiSC® is a personality framework that identifies four basic personality types:
  1. Dominance (D): Individuals that overcome the environment to achieve results
  2. Influence (i): Individuals that use enthusiasm and persuasion to shape others
  3. Steadiness (S): Individuals that are dependable and sincere
  4. Compliance (C):  Individuals that are accuracy and quality oriented
 
Dr G: “How do you think DiSC® is related to Answer Intelligence (AQ)™?”

Tracy Baumann: “DiSC® provides a personality profile for others that you need to keep in mind when communicating.  When you speak with a High-D, you want to keep communication short and to the point… No emojis.  In contrast, the High-I wants emojis… they want to use feelings to connect with others. The High-C wants practical and evidenced based information such as charts and graphs.” 

Dr. G: “In contrast to DiSC®, Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ is a communication framework with implications for traits.  Specifically, Answer with Style (High AQ Practice 4) holds that individuals have distinct communication preferences.  The practical style is associated with a preference for procedure and action answers to achieve results.  The analytical style is associated with a preference for concept and theory answers to explain and predict in a complex world.  Finally, the relational style is associated with a preference for story and metaphor answers to emotionally connect.  A big difference between AQ and DiSC® is that with AQ, only 1 of the 5 High AQ practices is focused upon traits, and the other 4 High AQ practices are focused upon question-and-answer principles you can apply across personality types.  For example, if you are asked “Why should I hire you?”, High AQ practice 1 holds you have six answer types to choose from (concept, theory, story, metaphor, procedure, action) and that either a theory or concept answer is most important.”

Tracy Baumann: “I agree.  Regardless of the questions being asked, the AQ styles make sense based upon my experience of how individuals prefer to communicate regardless of the specific questions being asked.  Then, there also is a recognition that every conversation has unique questions that must be effectively answered by all personality types.”

Dr G: “Leaning into the personality core of DiSC®, can you explain how The Brooks Group uses personality as you consult with your sales clients?”

Tracy Baumann: “We use DiSC® to hire the right people for the right positions.  We use it as a reliable source to narrow down the pool of applicants.  Certain personality types fit better for certain roles.  For instance, in sales the typical seller is a High-D and High-I (friendly and relationship oriented, but dominant).  We rarely hire someone in a sales role at The Brooks Group that is not the established benchmarked DiSC® profile. We have made mistakes in the past hiring the wrong person for a role.”

Dr G: “So if you hire on personality traits, how does any given communicator adapt to the unique questions and answers that flow in real time during a conversation? For example, I did a workshop for a sales organization selling enterprise software. In DiSC® terms, you could describe the sales reps as D-I types. In AQ terms, the D-personality related to practical answers (procedure and answers) they would prefer to provide others.  The I-personality related to story and metaphors the sales reps like to use to connect to others.  The problem, as underlined by the sales director at the workshop, was that many of his reps were being asked “why-questions” by senior executives, and the executives wanted strategy answers (theory in the AQ framework) and the sales reps were missing the mark. Often, they would default to answering the why-question by doing a feature and function dump (procedure and action dump in AQ vernacular).  Not responding with the right answer was a big problem.”

Tracy Baumann: “When we teach IMPACT Selling, something we do is teach sellers that whatever your style is, you should approach your prospect or client in neutral and adapt to the person you are communicating with.  In your example, the executives may have preferred analytical communication [theory and concept] and sellers should go to neutral and communicate with answers the executive buyer prefers.  More generally, of course, your point is that personality is not the same thing as communication.  Personality frameworks, like DiSC®, and communication frameworks, like Answer intelligence (AQ)™, overlap, but have distinct implications that stem from their vantage points.

Applying the AQ lens to other aspects of sales and marketing, I’m reminded of buyer personas.  You must have an understanding of the buyer to make sure you are communicating products and services to address their pain points.  Our research department regularly examines the current challenges of sales leaders.  These challenges could relate to questions and answers the buyer and seller exchange in a conversation.  In other words, personas could be mapped to specific questions and answers they provide.  Second, buyers are more educated now, and earlier in the sales process—they have more answers.  There is more of an emphasis in getting the conversation right, right away, or else you are out as a seller.  AQ provides a lens to inform personas.”

Dr G: “Your extension of AQ to personas underscores the general point we have been discussing—different frameworks (personas, DiSC®, Answer Intelligence (AQ)™) each hold different assumptions, principles, and practices about the world that inform unique, but partially overlapping, perspectives about the world.  Personas and AQ are distinct but can inform each other.  In similar terms, DiSC and AQ are distinct, but can inform each other.  DiSC® is a personality framework, first and foremost, and a communication framework second.”

Implications of AQ (a communication framework) for DiSC® (a personality framework)

To close this article, Dr G and Tracy Baumann compiled a short list of communication implications of Answer intelligence (AQ)™ that could inform our understanding of DiSC®.  The purpose of this list is not to provide solutions, but simply to suggest how AQ (a new communication framework) can push our understanding of DiSC® (a personality framework).  If these AQ implications are wrestled to the ground, the effectiveness of communicating to distinct personalities can be improved.

1. Which question types (why, what, how) are most associated with each DiSC® type (Dominance (D), Influence (i), Steadiness (S), Compliance (C))?

2. Which answer types (theory, concept, story, metaphor, procedure, action) are most associated with each DiSC® type?

3. How are questions and answers sequenced over a conversation depending on the DiSC® profiles of the conversation participants?

4. How do the 5 High AQ practices inform our understanding of communication for each DiSC® profile?
​This article suggests at least one High AQ Takeaway.

High AQ Takeaway: Business frameworks are based upon distinct assumptions.  Ultimately, DiSC® is a personality framework with implications for communication.  To better understand DiSC®, it can be combined with Answer Intelligence (AQ)™, a communication framework.  Effective consultants, coaches, and trainers will use multiple frameworks in combination to meet the needs of their clients.  It is important to understand how each framework can inform the other framework, as well as the limitations of any existing framework.
If you found Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ an interesting framework, please share this post with others. Also, try our Sales AQ free test to gauge your AQ.
0 Comments

Get Sales Role-Playing Right using Answer Intelligence (AQ)™

2/16/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Richard Harris is the Founder of the Harris Consulting Group. Richard teaches salespeople how to earn the right to ask questions, which questions to ask, and when. He is a 5x top 25 inside Sales Professional and strategic advisor.

This article is part of the High AQ Interview Series where executives, academics, and thought leaders discuss elevated answers. The following interview is edited for clarity.

Sales Role-Playing

Dr G: “You are known for your use of role playing during sales training.  How do you conduct role playing?”

Richard Harris:
“There are three steps: First, I teach a key concept. Second, I role play as a salesperson.  Third, the trainees role play as the salesperson.”

Dr G: “It is interesting you start with concept.  I interviewed theatre directors and my stated objective was to better understand the procedures and actions actors used to prepare for their roles and to perform on stage.  To my surprise, the directors shifted the focus away from procedures and actions to concepts.  In short, effective actors need to have an indwelling into concepts that formed the identify of a character.  For example, a character could be “jealous”, a “martyr”, or “honorable.”  It was the actor’s job to understand their character’s motivations and harness that motivation into a performance visible to the audience (as procedures and actions in AQ terms).

Can you give us an example of concepts relevant to a sales role play?”


Richard Harris: “Yesterday I was working with a global organization.  The topic of a difficult negotiator came up.  The client always wants 50% off.  These are sizable deals; each one is worth $200K to $300K.  The client organization is a Fortune 500 brand that has been a client for years.  The buyer is new to his role…. Let’s role play this.”

​Dr G:
“I’m game.”
Picture
​Seller (Richard): “Hi Brian, good to catch up with you.  The goal is to answer your questions regarding your concerns. I want to answer them directly. You have been with us for 10 years.  We want to keep the partnership going. We are going to talk about commercial terms. Is there something else?”

Buyer (Brian): “Thank you, Richard. I know we have had a great relationship. I want to be sensitive to your time.  I really need to get a better deal. We've invested a lot of time and energy in this relationship. I don't want to look elsewhere. I don't want to put this out to bid.  Can you work with me?”
​
Seller (Richard): “The challenge is 50%.  We want to keep working with you. The challenge is that 50% does not feel fair.  I can appreciate your need to be treated fairly.  My question to you…Are you stuck at 50% or is there flexibility?”

Buyer (Brian): “50% is my number.”

Seller (Richard): “I would hate to have you go out to bid.  When you think about going out to bid, have you been able to justify this need in the marketplace?” 

Buyer (Brian): “It’s been over 2 years and a lot has changed, so I really don’t have a good sense of where pricing is at.”

Seller (Richard): “Our pricing is dictated on what the market dictates, not a finance person with spreadsheets. I'm stuck to trying to justify 50%.  How could I do that?”

Buyer (Brian): I'm assuming you have taken a look at the marketplace… can you share the prices with me in the marketplace?  I know you’re trying to get the best deal on your side. I'm trying to do that on my side.  That’s business.”

Seller (Richard): “Yes, business. Not personal. We’re so embedded in 16 depts in your organization.  How long will it take you to scope the project and write the bid, not just bid it out?”

Buyer (Brian): “It will take 4 months, if I'm being realistic.”

Seller (Richard): “Would it just be you, or 3 others from other areas?”

Buyer (Brian): “It would be a few on my side and an analyst devoting a few weeks of work.”

Seller (Richard): “5 people.”

Buyer (Brian): “That is realistic.”

Seller (Richard): Just to scope out the bid, my guess there is more than 40 hours of work per person, 200 hours.  Is that reasonable?

Buyer (Brian): “Yes.”

Seller (Richard): “Then you have to get 3 bids.”

Buyer (Brian): That is our standard practice.

Seller (Richard): “Do you do 1 meeting with each person? Or multiple meetings, including a security review, among others?”

Buyer (Brian): “There will be multiple meeting layers; of course.”

Seller (Richard): “In terms of meeting times that is 10 hours (10 meetings with each vendor).  3 persons on your side with each of these calls.  Every meeting is 30 hours of time.  Then there is another 30 hours after the meeting. We are quickly getting to 500 hours even before we talk implementation.  When we do this, there are 6 months of install (hundreds of hours), and then hundreds of hours (un-installing our solution).

​At this point I broke character because I felt the pressure as my character; the economic impact wheels were spinning in my character’s head. I could sense, in a visceral way, the implausibility of my position as the buyer character. We proceeded to debrief the role-playing exercise.

Richard Harris: “It is all about economic impact.  In the role play, the buyer had a list of 10 things, and his team has 10 things.  All the projects get delayed.  What is the impact of that?  This is the opportunity cost.”

Dr G: “You’re framing the conversation in unobjectionable terms… As a seller, you could have said we can save you $X, but that is not believable (every seller can make these out-of-thin air promises), you have put the costs in terms that the client can see.”

Richard Harris: “That is part of it.  It is not costs, it is opportunity costs and economic value.  In the buyer’s eyes, if things don’t go well, he is on the line. It is a 10-year project.  I’m painting the buyer into a corner.”

Dr G: “This is fascinating.  In AQ terms, which concepts are important to this negotiation?”

Richard Harris: “There are a couple of important concepts.  First, in the setup we discussed a “difficult negotiator.”  It takes two to negotiate. If we start with the seller, we can understand important ideas that are holding the negotiations back.

The seller’s organization had a mandate to ‘never walk away’ from a deal.   This is recipe for disaster. Classic negotiation theory would suggest this is a lose-win orientation [Yielding]. Using the role-play, it illustrated a win-win approach [Problem Solving] by a seller.  Also, the role play demonstrated how to move a buyer from win-lose [Dominating] approach to a win-win [Problem Solving] approach.”
​
Dr G: “In AQ terms, you’re pointing out key concepts to avoid, such as Yielding by a seller, and the importance of shifting the seller and buyer both toward Problem Solving.”


Picture

​Richard Harris: “Unless you do role-playing, the salespeople don’t connect in a deep way to things they should change.  Never walk away from a deal [an action in AQ terms] is connected to Yielding [a concept in AQ terms].  To a person, the sales organization might say we don’t engage in “lose-win” negotiating, but that is exactly what they are doing when they have a tunnel-vision tactic like never walk away.  Only in a role play, does the big gap [disconnect between action and concepts in AQ terms] become real to the point they realize they need to change.

Also, I want to point out that as a seller you have to not only be focused on important concepts like Problem Solving, but the most effective sales people will help orient the buyer toward concepts they need to be successful as a buyer, in this case, Problem Solving.   In other words, both the buyer and seller need to focus on Problem Solving.

From my perspective, customers don’t know how to buy.  Customers must be guided and instructed on how to buy your product and service.   In this role-playing, you as the buyer, became oriented toward problem-solving, a key concept.  Thoughtful selling extends beyond concepts associated procedures and actions [answers in AQ terms].  For example, it is not just what you do, but how you do it.  In the prior role play, I painted the buyer into a corner.  But, in terms of how I did it, I could have pulled many other tactical levers.  For example, I did not get into legal costs associated with going out to bid.  So on and so forth, the effective seller gets the actions right.

Finally, I want to make one last point regarding role-playing. I think there is a difference between ‘having a script’ and ‘sounding scripted.’  You want to have a script, but you want to remain authentic.  This means that role-playing forces the conversation to be natural and for the seller to find their own voice.”

High AQ Takeaway: Those with High AQ get role-playing right.
The following points are a summary of what makes for an effective role play in AQ terms.
​
  1. Concepts: First and foremost, theatre directors and Richard Harris (a sales expert) both point out that actors embody their characters when they understand key concepts (such as problem solving or yielding) during a negotiation. The purpose of the role play is to surface these concepts and connect them in a meaningful way during a training.
  2. Performance: Skills are applied as a performance art. Accordingly, sales role-playing puts individuals in a position where they must perform. In AQ terms, all of the answers (story, metaphor, theory, concept, procedure, action) must be put into action. This gets to Richard Harris' point of not being "scripted." Each answer must be put into each sellers' own words. Additionally, getting the lines right, timing, and delivery all matter. This requires role-playing and practice.
  3. Context: Although not foregrounded in the prior discussion in AQ terms, Context matters. In the set up for the role-playing, these are important context details that must be established for role-playing to be effective. Additionally, Richard Harris suggests role-playing by discussing an upcoming sales opportunity. When a real-prospect is focused upon (as opposed to a hypothetical prospect), it brings to bear context knowledge -- about the buyer's firm, the buyer herself, and more -- all of which make role-playing conversations realistic and meaningful learning experiences. See High AQ Practice 5 (Answer in Context) for more information.
If you found Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ an interesting framework, please share this post with others. Also, try our Sales AQ free test to gauge your AQ.

Additionally, you are encouraged to learn more about
N.E.A.T. Selling™, a philosophy developed by Richard Harris that is consistent with the role-playing examples discussed in this article.
0 Comments

Separate the Lies From the Truth During Sales Conversations

2/11/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Tony Cole is the Founder & Chief Learning Officer at Anthony Cole Training Group, LLC. For 27 years, Anthony Cole Training Group has been helping organizations close their sales opportunity gap by helping them sell better, coach better, and hire better.

This article is part of the High AQ Interview Series where executives, academics, and thought leaders discuss elevated answers.  The following interview is edited for clarity.

​All prospects Lie and/or lie

There is a Lie with an upper-case-L that is barefaced and hurtful.  Then there is a lie with a lower-case-l, a lie that is not hurtful, hateful, or deceitful.  We associate the AQ answers (story, metaphor, theory, concept, procedure, action) with the lies (upper + lower case) or truth prospects communicate.  A sales rep can ask, “Why did you agree to this meeting?” The prospect may return with a white lie (withholding a house-on-fire story), or not acknowledging a vendor off-stage (perhaps a capital-L lie).  Of course, lies exist on a continuum between upper-case and lower-case lies.

The following discussion centers upon lies during conversations with prospects and how Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ can help separate the lies from the truth.

Dr G: “There are a lot of question methodologies in sales.  How does AQ add value?”

Tony Cole: “I just conducted a three-hour workshop on the art and science of question asking.  We teach about the importance of effective questions to get the answers you want, but it is great to have a simple visual of questions and answers that can orient a sales rep for their next important conversation.”

Dr G: “Can you give me a specific example of how the AQ framework can help sales reps?”

Tony Cole: “We teach about the importance to know that prospects lie (not hurtful, hateful, or deceitful).  The prospect will provide an answer to meet their objectives as a buyer.  You must understand the motivation of the buyer.  When a prospect agrees to a meeting, it might be because the prospect has a new boss and was asked to investigate the seller’s solution.  The prospect’s intention may not be to buy, but to interpret the seller’s solution using a hidden compare-and-contrast to a favored solution.  Ultimately, although possible to overcome, the outcome on the scales is tipped toward a no.  The prospect ultimately wanted to report back to her boss that she checked out the solution, and her alternative was better.

In this scenario, AQ is valuable because it connects questions to answers so a seller knows which types of answers to expect and how to navigate those answers.  For example, we teach drill-down questions.  Therefore, we could drill-down into a story or procedure [both answers in AQ terms] to get at the truth.”

Dr G: “This is interesting.  It reminds me of the 5-Whys associated with Japanese management approaches.  You ask Why five times and by the 5th time (or sooner), you get to the root cause. Therefore, in AQ terms, if a story is provided by a prospect, a seller can ask Why multiple times to understand it.  In similar terms, if a metaphor answer is provided a seller can ask What multiple times; or a for a procedure answer that is provided a seller can ask How multiple times.”

Tony Cole: “It is important to note that the drill-down can’t be mechanical.  You correctly point out, you may stop after 2 drill downs, but a sales rep that is acting mechanical would always ask 5 drill down questions.  Or, if a seller is provided questions to ask, too often they go through the list of questions in a check list style manner…. What is keeping you up at night?  Why did you contact me?  What is your budget?...  Question fatigue will set in.  This is an example of what we mean by the art of question asking.”

Dr G: “Interesting. Your drill-down questions remind me of the Five High AQ practices and techniques that can be used to gauge the veracity of answers.  For example, High AQ practice 3 is to provide complements. Every given answer can be complemented by adjacent answers.  For example, if a prospect tells a story, a seller can ask a follow up question, “Can you explain the underlying logic of your story?” this would represent a theory answer (in AQ terms).  Or as a seller can paraphrase the buyer’s story as a metaphor.  Both theory and metaphor are adjacent answers, and they help you triangulate the truth of the seller’s answers.  Or you can pivot to any answer type.  At the extreme, if all six answer types (story, metaphor, theory, concept, procedure, action) are covered, which is referred to as the strong form of complementary answers, then you have a complete sense of their true answers.  Lies or half-truths are difficult to maintain across multiple answer types, and naturally give way to true answers as you begin to triangulate all the answers together.”

Tony Cole: “This makes sense.  Also, the AQ framework can be connected to open vs. closed questions.  We discourage closed questions that yield yes, no answers; these are conversation killers.   The six AQ answers are associated with open questions, where you would anticipate a story, metaphor, or any of the six answer types.”

Tony Cole: “What type of answer should a seller be looking for from a prospect?”

Dr G: “Great question. The AQ framework suggests there are 5 High AQ practices, and each practice suggests a different answer type(s) to focus upon. For example, High AQ Practice 1 focuses upon identifying the best answer to a given question. Therefore, if a seller asks, “Why did you take my meeting?” the seller may be interested in a story or a theory as the best answer.  Perhaps, the seller wants a story and its associated richness to start the conversation. High AQ Practice 3, as discussed prior relates to providing complementary answers. In that case, if a story answer is provided by the seller, the buyer would be looking to steer the conversation toward a theory and/or metaphor answer.  Finally, one more example, according to High AQ Practice 4, Answer with Style, a seller would try to identify the answer style of a buyer—relational (preference for story + metaphor), analytical (preference for concept + theory), or practical (procedure + action)—and try to steer the conversation toward the preferred answer preferences of the buyer.

Each of the 5 High AQ answers provides a partially overlapping approach toward identifying the target answer types of a buyer.  Related to your prior point, choose which one of the 5 High AQ practices to focus upon at each point in the conversation, and over the entire conversation, get into the art of communication.”
​
Tony Cole: “There is a place for this. The whole idea… of asking questions in and of itself is a challenge.  AQ makes it easier, when you ask a question, only some categories of answers are possible. The two things, questions and answers, come together in one framework with AQ.”
​This article suggests at least one High AQ takeaway.

High AQ Takeaway: Seller conversations often involve white lies or unfortunately barefaced lies.  Using AQ and the 5 High AQ practices, it is possible for the seller to steer the conversation toward the truth, saving everyone time, building relationships, shortening sales cycles, closing more deals, and perhaps first and foremost just making conversations with prospects more enjoyable.   
If you found Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ an interesting framework, please share this post with others.
​
Try our Sales AQ free test to gauge your AQ.
0 Comments

Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ is a New Tool in the Executive Coaches' Toolbox

2/4/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Ivan Košalko is an Executive Coach and owner of Košalko Consulting LLC.  His target customers are the companies and organizations in which the owners, leaders, and senior managers believe that their people are their most important assets. His focus is the growth of first-time managers, particularly in fast growing companies. He typically starts with strengths coaching, which is backed by certification from Gallup—he is a Gallup® Certified Strengths Coach.

This article is part of the High AQ Interview Series where executives, academics, and thought leaders discuss elevated answers.  The following interview is edited for clarity.

The Tools of Executive Coaching

Dr G: “You are a Gallup® Certified Strengths Coach.  You also use other frameworks with clients.  What is your perspective on the use of frameworks by executive coaches in the marketplace?”

Ivan Košalko: “Many coaches focus upon one methodology as the holy grail of coaching. I use several different frameworks with clients depending on their developmental needs.”

Dr G: “How do you decide which frameworks to use with clients?”

Ivan Košalko: “Each tool offers something different that meets different client needs.  As we know, CliftonStrengths is a framework of 34 strengths which allow a coach to work with the clients to further develop their potential.  This contrasts with a focus upon shoring up weakness, which predominates in most consulting and coaching.  The CliftonStrengths framework is necessary because most individuals are very poor at identifying their strengths.  If you ask a client to identify their biggest weakness, that is much easier than wrestling to the ground their strengths. Working with a framework like CliftonStrengths gives the coach and client a common language to discuss strengths and come to agreement regarding the areas of biggest growth potential.”

Dr G: “Can you tell me more about the value of frameworks in Executive Coaching?”

Ivan Košalko: “Each framework simplifies and organizes the work.  CliftonStrengths helps us understand strengths.  Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ is a framework that provides a lot of value to communication.  Listening is central to executive coaching. Often, listening can be difficult for an executive coach because clients don’t always give the best answer.  A coach may ask a question, and the other person starts to talk about something else, not the answer we are looking for.  Or they don’t answer the question at all.  You ask why, and they provide a how-answer.  The AQ framework helps to navigate the conversation correctly. 
  
I have a meeting with a client upcoming that is very long winded.  It takes a lot of stamina for me to remain focused on the conversation at a very attuned level I need to be effective.  AQ provides a structure that allows me to navigate the conversation.  For example, if the client provides a story, I can see if the story is in line with a concept they claim they are using.” 
Note: this is consistent with High AQ Practice 3: Provide Complements; the strong form of complimentary answers is that all six answer types are complementary and reinforce each other.
“Or If I ask a why-question, I can listen for two answer types, a story and theory.”
Note: this is consistent with High AQ Practice 2:  Answer Twice; important why-, what-, and how-questions can be answered twice for maximum impact and clarity.
“Therefore, I use AQ as a proof tool.  As the expression goes, the clients often do not know themselves very well.  By looking at the consistency between answers I can identify their authentic answers.  AQ gives me a framework that allows me to be a better listener.”

Dr G: “You did a good job describing the value of AQ to you as a coach.  Can you discuss the value of AQ to your clients that are using CliftonStrengths?”

Ivan Košalko: “Let me give you an example related to myself.  In CliftonStrengths terms, I have a strong ‘Focus’ Theme.” [note: The Focus theme is oriented toward staying on track, prioritizing, and then taking action.]  “For a Focus thinker, AQ is an approach to identify and navigate questions and answers in a systematic and structured way that a focus-themed person values.”

Dr G: “Is it fair to say that all 34 CliftonStrengths themes can be combined with AQ as an approach to communicate related to each client’s respective strengths?”

Ivan Košalko: “Yes, that is correct.  I have a client meeting coming up on Friday where I will be finalizing the scope of work.  As part of the work, I will have her develop a list of daily and weekly questions she is to ask of herself to create new strengths-based habits.  One recommendation I will make is for her to use AQ to identify the answers to those questions.

Paradoxically, it is the individuals that have strong Communication talent that benefit most from AQ.  When you are an effective communicator, you often use intuition.  When people do things intuitively, there is a significant growth potential for clients that are exposed to the right tools.  When clients are not aware of tools, they make mistakes that could otherwise be avoided.  I had several clients that in a sense communicate with ease – they are expressive, articulate, have a strong stage presence, and can deliver a compelling story or other type of answer.  Their blind spot might be that they are not involved in a conversation with others and they tend to monopolize the debate. For example, they say, “I don’t mean to interrupt… then of course they do and they discuss whatever they are interested in or they force their opinion on others. With AQ these kind of clients could benefit from understanding how question-types are mapped to answer-types.  They can recognize the question [why, what, or how] and using AQ to provide the appropriate answer in the context of the conversation.”

Dr G: “This makes a lot of sense to me.  In many respects, I’ve always been an effective communicator my entire adult life. For example, I have always been strong at metaphors and stories, but I was often overly analytical (focusing upon theory and concept).  This analytical fixation would often drown out the other answers I could provide. When I was a junior professional out of college, my boss valued my contributions, but others could not understand me.  In AQ terms (which would not yet be invented for another 15 years), I would talk about models and system (associated with analytical communication) and my peers wanted a story or perhaps a procedure to get work done. It was a real problem and communication disconnect. We even explored the company hiring a personal communication coach for me.  It was not until I developed the AQ framework that I finally had a tool to improve my conversations with others. Your discussion of strengths has given me an insight into myself as an effective, but flawed communicator, that could benefit from a framework (AQ in this example). Thank you for making that connection for me between strengths and the importance of frameworks.”
​This article suggests at least two High AQ Takeaways.

High AQ Takeaway 1: Effective coaches need to be effective listeners, as they seek to read between the lines to understand their clients. AQ is a framework that organizes questions and answers allowing an executive coach to be a more systematic and effective listener. 

High AQ Takeaway 2: Executive coaches should provide their clients with multiple frameworks, that are often used in combination. CliftonStrengths identifies among 34 strengths a client may have.  AQ provides a framework by which any of the strengths can be more effectively communicated by a client.
If you found Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ an interesting framework, please share this post with others.
0 Comments

Use Quotes to Open a Window to Key Concepts in Your Next Conversation

1/28/2021

1 Comment

 
Picture

​A Quote is a Concept-Answer

When I was in high school, I bought a book of famous quotations at Borders Bookstore.  I’ve always been fascinated by quotes.  Successful communicators use quotes during presentations, on their website, or during a coaching session with a client.  A quote is a type of answer, but in AQ terms, which answer type is a quote (story, metaphor, theory, concept, procedure, or action)?  

Before I answer this question, let me take a step back to discuss answers in AQ terms.  There are six answer types (again; story, metaphor, theory, concept, procedure, or action) and any other type of answer can be mapped to these six answer types.  If you were asked for an “example”, this could be mapped to all six answer types. If you are asked, “Can you provide me an example of how a customer implements your software?” this could elicit a procedure-answer.  Or, if asked, “Can you give me an example of customer success?” this could elicit a story-answer.  An example has a one-to-many relationship to the six answer types, potentially representing all six answer types depending on the context and framing of the question.  Therefore, it is important for a communicator to get the form of answer correct when an example is asked for.

In similar terms, a quote has a one-to-many relationship to the six AQ answer types.  However, it is my belief that a quote has a primary mapping to a concept-answer.  For example, when I teach students in the classroom, I often share this quote from famed Indy car driver Mario Andretti… 

“If you have everything under control, you're not moving fast enough… If you feel like you're under control, you're just not going fast enough.”

I share this quote to locate the concept of “risk-taking” for a student body that is often risk averse.  I want them to understand and believe in the concept of risk-taking.  In the classroom, or in business, as communicators we believe in important concepts, and we can communicate those concepts directly to others by using a definition.  I could have defined risk-taking for my students. However, I’ve never seen a student read a definition and get animated with belief.  Unlike a definition, a quote can inspire. 

The source of inspiration from quotes is two-fold.  First, the source of the quote has credibility as an authority figure.  Mario Andretti was a world class driver. In similar terms, at a client site when you give a sales presentation, a quote from a large Fortune 500 company provides credibility. Second, a related point, the credibility emanates from the experiences of the quote source.  It is not hard to imagine that Mario Andretti has direct knowledge of risk taking.  Or in the context of a sales presentation, credibility goes up if the Fortune 500 quote source is from an industry that is the same as the prospects.  If the quote source and prospect firm is from the same industry, the experience base is similar, giving credibility to the quote.
​
In summary, the Mario Andretti quote is a “window into a concept.” The concept of risk-taking is understood based upon source credibility and source experiences.

Leadership Quotes

To further illustrate quotes-as-concepts, let’s examine a subset of the top 100 leadership quotes as identified by Inc.  I will choose 3 quotes to make three points.  First, quotes are concept-answers.  Second, quotes are based upon credibility/experiences.  Third, a new point, each concept associated with a quote can evoke different “dimensions” of the concept of leadership.

Let’s examine three quotes to illustrate from the Inc.com top 100 list:

Quote 1:
"The quality of a leader is reflected in the standards they set for themselves." – Ray Kroc

Quote 1 evokes the concept of “quality” and Ray Kroc is a source of credibility because he built the McDonald’s restaurant system into what it is today by focusing upon repeatable standards and methods to develop a uniform quality experience every time for a customer.

Quote 2:
"Becoming a leader is synonymous with becoming yourself. It is precisely that simple and it is also that difficult."  – Warren Bennis

Quote 2 evokes the concept of “authenticity” and Warren Bennis is a source of credibility because he was a Professor at the University of Southern California (USC) often credited as the founder of modern leadership studies.  In short, he studied the best leaders in the world; his experiences with those leaders give him credibility.

Quote 3:
“A leader is best when people barely know he exists. When his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselves."  – Lao Tzu
​
Quote 3 evokes the concept of “empowerment” and Lao Tzu is a source of credibility because he was an ancient Chinese Philosopher who founded Taoism, and a deity in traditional Chinese religions.

In a sense, leadership is too big of a concept to reduce to one quote -- that is why Inc compiled 100 leadership quotes. The point is that leadership is multi-dimensional.  In the three quotes above, I evoke three sub-dimensions of leadership: quality, authenticity, and empowerment.  At the extreme, the 100 quotes could represent 100 dimensions of leadership. In practice, a content analysis of the 100 quotes would reveal several repeated concepts.  In social science, a “factor analysis” is a statistical process to reduce the number of dimensions of an overall concept into a parsimonious subset.  Looking at quotes does not lend itself to a statistical factor analysis, but the point still stands that the dimensions of leadership quotes can be reduced to a smaller list of concepts.

Building upon the prior paragraph, the final point regarding quotes and concepts is that quotes are often effective at locating to the multitude of sub-dimensions of a concept, to point out to an audience that a specific sub-dimension (such as quality, authenticity, and empowerment for overall leadership) deserves our attention.


​If you found Answer Intelligence (AQ)® an interesting framework, please share this post with others. ​
1 Comment

An Interview with Mike Soenke, retired DOW 30 SVP and USA CFO: Six Answers to Elevate your Career (Part 2 of 2)

1/21/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Mike Soenke is an Executive in Residence at North Central College (Naperville, IL, USA) and retired DOW 30 SVP and USA CFO. 

In this two-part series, Mike and I discuss Answer Intelligence (AQ)® based upon his experience as a former executive at a DOW 30 corporation.  The focus of this blog post (2 of 2) is using AQ to elevate your career.  The prior post focused upon using AQ to elevate your organization. The following interview is edited for clarity.

This article is part of the High AQ Interview Series where executives, academics, and thought leaders discuss elevated answers.

Using AQ to Elevate Your Career

Dr. G: “As you look at the Answer Intelligence (AQ)® framework, can you describe its significance to a finance professional?”

Mike Soenke: “The single biggest opportunity related to a leadership competency throughout the finance function was the ability to influence key stakeholders.  AQ is an influence framework.”

Dr. G: “When you were U.S. CFO of a DOW 30 organization, can you discuss how finance professionals typically improved their ability to influence over time?”

Mike Soenke: “Out of college, finance staff are technically proficient doers. In AQ terms, they focus on the practical style (procedures and actions).  A lot of finance staff can communicate in blue [the practical style] describing the financial standards guiding their work.

When better finance staff  progress, they start to work with people across the business … if all they can do is recite the standards they will not go very far… a lot of business people will get frustrated.  For example, a business person may say, ‘I don’t understand why we can’t do X, Y, or Z to recognize more revenue.’  Better finance professionals will be able to get into the analytical skill and use concept and theory to clearly explain the purpose behind a standard and why it makes sense.  Moreover, the more skilled communicators can translate finance into layman terms so that a non-technical person can easily understand. 

Theory and concept knowledge extends to business strategy and broader principles of finance as one progresses in finance.  For example, a strong financial leader would proactively influence the right financial discipline: ‘We want to do X, Y, or Z to increase shareholder value… or we will not get the return that meets or exceeds the cost of capital so the enterprise value will erode if we make this decision.’

Relational communication, story and metaphor, is the capstone for financial and really all business leaders.  As I mentioned earlier, finance is initially steeped in action and process [Practical style], and many can stretch to theory and concept, but only the expert level financial leader can excel at stories and metaphors to maximize their influence.  For example, throughout my career I often had to influence independent franchise owners to support company initiatives through investment in labor, food cost, marketing or longer-term capital improvements.  In addition to providing a data driven business case you often had to find a way to emotionally engage them with metaphors and stories of success to create system alignment.  For example, I would often have a franchisee leader passionately share their story of customer satisfaction and financial success in support of the broader initiative … I wanted to pull people in and create enthusiastic system-wide support.
​
There is a lot of skill in getting stories and metaphors right. While I preferred to use positive stories to inspire action, there were times when painting a negative picture of the future absent bold actions was equally or more impactful.” 

Answer Progression from Junior Accountant to Executive

Picture
Dr. G: “You make a compelling case for a progression toward the relational style.  Can you tell me a little bit about how an expert finance communicator, who has mastered story and metaphor, also weaves in the other answer modes?”

Mike Soenke: “Of course, as I’m telling the story, I’m weaving in the theory and concept, and I would discuss procedures and actions associated with the story that a franchisee executed against to achieve success.  Therefore, one story can be a touchstone for all the other six answer types.

A skilled communicator can start with procedures... outlining the rules were not followed, and then pivot to a story of failure to drive home the consequences of not following the rules. Also, an effective story must be constructed to support your theory and concepts.  For example, if there are three initiatives [key strategies; or concepts/theories in AQ terms] I might emphasize the synergies in emphasizing all three initiatives at the same time in the story, to inspire them to go after all three to generate incremental cash flow to make customers happy.”

Dr. G: “Why do you think all finance professionals are not able to be effective relational communicators (using stories and metaphors)?”

Mike Soenke: “Two things.  First, people gravitate to a field like finance, or software development, because they are more technical in their knowledge base.  Finance professionals are more introverted and communicating with stories and metaphors does not come naturally to many.  This means individuals are more comfortable in the practical style of communication.

​Second, during my career, finance professionals did not have a thought framework to build out the different communication skills.  Yes, we knew stories could be effective to engage, and we had an inventory of metaphors, but we did not have an organizational framework to make sense of all six answer types and map these answers to questions.  In addition to an organizing framework, we did not have a roadmap to build out our communication competency in a layered manner. Using AQ and the 5 practice areas, it is possible to build communication skills over time in a thoughtful manner."

Dr. G: “You’ve discussed that finance professionals progress in their career from practical, to analytical, to relational influence.   Does the sequence of progression follow this pattern outside of finance?”
​
Mike Soenke: “For different functions, or even for specific individuals within finance, the sequence of progression could be different.  It might be a given professionals can tell stories and metaphors, but they don’t have concepts or theories behind them, or the ability to execute with procedures and actions is lacking.  Therefore, it is possible for the process to be reversed in certain professionals.”
High AQ Takeaway: According to Mike Soenke, finance professionals (and other technical professionals) will first provide influence with practical communication (procedure + action).  Then, those that progress in their career master analytical communication (concept + theory). Finally, those that aspire to become executives will need to develop relational communication skills (story + metaphor).
​If you found Answer Intelligence (AQ)® an interesting framework, please share this post with others. 
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>
    Access Octomono Masonry Settings

    Author

    Dr. Brian Glibkowski is the author of Answer Intelligence: Raise your AQ.​

    Picture

    Archives

    June 2022
    February 2022
    September 2021
    June 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020

    Categories

    All
    Answer Intelligence (AQ)
    AQ In Video
    AQ Practices
    Concept Answers
    DISC AQ
    Executive Coaching AQ
    Explore AQ Assessment
    Featured AQ Articles
    Featured AQ Podcasts & Webinars
    High AQ Interview Series
    Interview AQ
    My AQ
    Organizational Adoption
    Personality
    Sales AQ
    Training AQ

    RSS Feed

Picture
​Answer Intelligence (AQ)™ is the ability to provide elevated answers to explain and predict in a complex world, emotionally connect, and achieve results.
Quick Access Links
Buy the Book​​​
Explore AQ (Free Assessment)
​​AQ 101 Video
AQ TEDx Video
5 High AQ Practices​
AQ Certification
​Book Launch Videos
AQ YouTube Channel​
Research


Contact Us
Partner Login
Add Me

© 2020-2022 Semplar Science Corp. All Rights Reserved.

  • Introducing AQ
  • Products
    • (FREE) Explore AQ
    • AQ Development Workbook
    • AQ Maturity Assessment
    • DISC AQ
    • AQ Record & Rate
    • Raise Your AQ App
  • Training
  • Partner
    • Overview
    • Certification
    • Certified Partners
  • Dr Glibkowski
  • Blog
  • Contact